By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Neighbors of Social Circle vehicle production site say news 'blindsided' them
Rivian, Newton's joint development authority to meet with residents with concerns about impact
Joint Development Authority chairman Jerry Silvio of Newton County listens to an area resident tell her concerns about negative impacts of the Rivian plant Tuesday, Dec. 28, during a meeting at the Georgia Bioscience Training Center near Social Circle. - photo by Tom Spigolon

SOCIAL CIRCLE, Ga. — A chief industrial recruiter had a blunt message Tuesday for residents hoping they could convince Rivian Automotive not to build a $5 billion electric vehicle factory near Social Circle.

“That ship has sailed,” said Shane Short, executive director of the Development Authority of Walton County.

Short was responding to questions and comments from residents of Walton and Morgan counties living near the site of the planned electric vehicle production and research facility during a Joint Development Authority meeting Tuesday, Dec. 28, at the Georgia BioScience Training Center in Stanton Springs business park.

California-based electric vehicle company Rivian announced Dec. 16 it would build its second U.S. production facility on a 2,000-acre site within the Stanton Springs North business park at I-20’s Exit 101 at U.S. Hwy. 278.

The site is mostly in the Social Circle city limits in the northeast quadrant of the interchange, bordering the Newton County line and covering the southern tip of Walton County and far western Morgan County.

About 10 area residents Tuesday told the Joint Development Authority (JDA) of Jasper, Morgan, Newton and Walton counties about what they saw as lack of transparency, as well as their concerns about the impact on the area’s rural nature.

Some residents also said they had to consult local and regional media about the 7,500-employee project potentially coming rather than hearing it from area governments or development authorities.

Social Circle resident Christine Wertz said she never would have moved to her Darel Drive home adjacent to the site if she had known about Rivian’s plans.

“The lack of transparency is deeply troubling to me and I think to many others,” she said.

James Evans of Social Circle said he worried about the impact of construction on well water that many area residents rely on.

He also said he was unhappy with the timing of Rivian’s announcement near the holidays when residents’ attention may be turned elsewhere.

“It just blindsided everybody,” said Evans, who has lived in the area since 2004.

Joellen Artz of Rutledge lives near the site and said she believed Morgan County would lose “hundreds and hundreds of acres of farmland” for construction of the factory.

She also said Rivian eventually may abandon its factory just as vehicle makers in other states did — including in Normal, Illinois, where Rivian opened its initial factory in a former Mitsubishi facility.

Short said the JDA planned to host town hall meetings for area residents in the Rutledge area and for those living on roads around the site. It planned to advertise them on the JDA’s website and social media platforms.

He said Rivian also planned to meet with residents and work with them on addressing any concerns. 

Short, who is one of two industrial recruiters for the JDA, said Rivian approached the Georgia Department of Economic Development about the site and state officials turned responsibility for the project over to the JDA.

He said potential large employers typically demand recruiters and public officials sign non-disclosure agreements legally binding them to not revealing any information before making the information public.

Development agencies and recruiters want to announce their successes and have no “intent” to keep such large projects secret, he said.

“We just couldn’t legally tell you what’s happening,” Short said.

Short said companies require the agreements for such reasons as keeping the information from competitors or stock trading issues, he said.

“They control the timing very carefully,” Short said. “There’s still some things (about Rivian) we can’t talk about.”

However, he added that “the company’s coming.”

“You can’t stop that, but they’re open to listening to your concerns,” Short said.

Rivian planned to start site work for construction of its facility in mid-2022 and begin production of vehicles by 2024.

Short said the government would not use its power of eminent domain to essentially take land.

“Every property owner gave us their price,” Short said.

State leaders researching the Kia plant in West Point, Georgia, correctly found that most of its worker likely would choose to live away from the immediate area of the plant site, Short said.

He predicted that same scenario will repeat itself for the Rivian plant’s 7,500 workers because of the lack of available housing around the site, lack of infrastructure plans by area governments, and few shopping opportunities nearby.

“We have had zero discussions about apartments,” Short said, addressing another resident’s concerns.

Local leaders control how residential and commercial growth proceeds in any area of Georgia, he added.

Rutledge resident Sim Sergiadis predicted his neighbors would continue to make their feelings known loudly and publicly in the future about their opposition to the project.

“I’m selling ropes and torches,” he joked.

Rivian discussion
Area residents talk with Joint Development Authority members following the Authority's Dec. 28 meeting at the state's Bioscience Training Center near Social Circle. - photo by Tom Spigolon