Commissioner Mort Ewing's Proposal (approved by informal consensus):
Level One SPLOST projects
Jail pods debt service - $3 million
Administration Building debt service - $5 million
Judicial Center (expansion) - $7 million
Level Two SPLOST projects
Upgrade parks - $1 million
Miracle League Field - $1.5 million
District 4 improvements - $1.1 million
Animal Control - $100,000
Juvenile facility - $500,000
Historic Jail - $1.2 million
Agricultural facility - $1.1 million
Fire Station #8 - $1.1 million
Hospital emergency room - $4 million
Landfill debt service - $500,000
Public Works equipment - $500,000
County vehicle replacement - $2.5 million
Fire services - $100,000
Road improvements - $17.28 million
Municipal SPLOST projects
Transportation - $6.96 million
Airport - $500,000
Porterdale (these numbers have been altered)
Transportation - $394,000
Porterdale Gym - $400,000
Recreation - $36,000
Unspecified - $1.23 million
Transportation - $252,630
Transportation, recreation and community center - $336,840
Total: $57.6 million
County Commissioner Mort Ewing's original 2011, $57.6 million SPLOST proposal is expected to be the final list presented to voters at the March 15 special election.
Commissioners Nancy Schulz and Earnest Simmons, who opposed Ewing's list, made counter proposals at Tuesday night's work session and called for unity, but neither was able to garner majority support.
Commissioners Ewing, Tim Fleming and J.C. Henderson pledged support for Ewing's proposal previously and are expected to officially vote for his SPLOST list at Tuesday's regularly scheduled board meeting at 7 p.m. at the Historic Courthouse.
Henderson was absent from Tuesday's board meeting, and although he had not seen Schulz's revised proposal as of Wednesday evening, he said still supported Ewing's proposal.
Schulz's Revised Proposal
Chairman Kathy Morgan went down Ewing's list item by item Tuesday, giving more project details and telling commissioners whether the project would have future maintenance and operation costs.
She said previously she believed the 2011 SPLOST should contain more money to pay off county debt, because otherwise some debt would have to be paid out of the general fund. Ewing allocated $8.5 million to pay off debt on the Newton County Detention Center, Administration Building and landfill. Morgan said Tuesday that under Ewing's proposal the county would have to pay around $1.8 million out of the general fund during the next six years.
Schulz's revised proposal called for an additional $1.59 million to pay debt, while making slight reductions from other line items. The board will not issue bonds based on expected SPLOST collections to pay for any projects, as it has done in the past.
"I think we've all listened to our constituents over the past couple of weeks and I know that all of us know how important it is to pass the SPLOST. And I feel very strongly that we need a list that all of us can support," Schulz said. "Everything that I've listened to over the last few weeks tells me that good fiscal policy is to focus on reducing your debt as much as possible."
The list is the major portion of the SPLOST, but the county and the county's five cities must also pass an intergovernmental agreement if they want to be able to collect the additional tax for six years.
Representatives from all five cities met with Chairman Morgan and a county attorney earlier Tuesday to discuss a revised intergovernmental agreement. Based on various comments Tuesday night, it appeared that the cities had supported an agreement including Ewing's proposal and were all set to officially vote on the agreement next week, either at a regularly scheduled or special called meeting.
When asked, Jenny Carter, an attorney in County Attorney Tommy Craig's law office, said that if the board voted to approve a different SPLOST list, the cities would have to re-vote on a new agreement. She asked if all commissioners were satisfied with the terms of the agreement, if not the actual list, and all four present commissioners showed signs of agreement.
Morgan attempted to call for another informal consensus vote on the agreement as a whole, but Ewing said a consensus had already been reach on both the list, at a Dec. 18 work session, and on the rest of the intergovernmental agreement.
"I'm not going to reach any further agreements tonight," he said.
Simmons and Schulz said they still had serious concerns about the consensus list.
"It's of concern to me that we could be going forward with a plan that we might have people that actively vote against it, because we were unwilling to look at compromise. And I think that is tragic. And that is something this board is going to have to live with," Schulz said.